I was on vacation yesterday (I had the day off from work) so I was kinda surprised to see that I had three new cards to the site today. This morning I got all my work on the HD 5770 and HD 5750 completely done and I setup the GT216 chip, GT 200 series and I created the GT 220 page. Now I am about to start adding the GT 220 cards, reviews, and Newegg links. It's not easy to balance my work on the site with the work I do at my real job, but I do it all for you dear readers.
The shiny Sapphire HD 5750:






n00b
n00b
It's priced the same as the 4670, but performs notably worse. It should be $10 cheaper.
n00b
n00b
Keep up the good work with the site Steve! I love this website!
n00b
Senior Member
having big issues with yields
ATI went through the same thing, back
with the 2900. not an issue with yields
but a bad pin in production. took them
some time to figure it out....nvidia
got a lead on them then as well
n00b
Senior Member
ati had a bad pin
that as years ago
Senior Member
Silent launch? Check.
Member
The GT210/220's are base off the GT200 silicon, which didn't prove to be that earth shattering wonderful for original 260/280's or the latter re-spins. Actually for shrinking from the 65Nm of the G96 architecture to a 40Nm these aren't that much better off in power/performance to the older or comparable ATI cards. It's nice they finally got to providing Dx10.1/HDMI support; although even that foregoes the on board audio chip ATI employs so Nvidia has less cost involved.
Has any review site actually ran a GT210 against a 4350 apples to apples... I mean it's not a big expensive thing, and please not gaming! I'm talking video decording, playback, CPU usage, power and heat more of those task and concerns for HTPC duty. Maybe they'll wait for Cedar/Redwood release then mop up!
n00b
It reminds me of the 4770 honestly.