Quick Card Search:
navigation About Us Contact Us Compare Videocards Forum Links Search Cards Submit A Videocard Videocard Table Home Video Card Review Finder Video Card Superlatives Video Card Database Video Card News
Tabs   Tabs

The GeForce GTX 480 and GTX 470 launch at PAX East.

This afternoon I was fortunate to be in attendance at Nvidia's GTX 480 launch (btw our review will be on the site fairly soon) in the main theatre here at PAX East. During the event I was live blogging using my @stevemcbarnes Twitter account, so you can read those tweets, or you can read the following.

Nvidia's presenter was none other than Drew Henry the General Manager of GeForce and Nvidia. He let us know that they decided to launch their new product here at PAX because of the support, passion and honest of the PAX attendees. He thanked us for being so patient with them and he says the reason that the development of their new cards took so long is because they wanted to take their time to do it right in order to make a product that would really impress us.

 

 

Drew flat out said that the GTX 480 is the fastest graphic card in the world and then he showed us a graph that compared the performance of the GTX 285 to the performance of the GTX 480. According to the graph the GTX 480 is close to or more than twice as fast as the GTX 285. The crowd was actually impressed which means that he did a pretty good job of presenting the information.

The theme for the new product is 'Crank that shit up!' (they spell it S#!T). They have it printed on shirts and on several banners hanging around the convention center. During the various 3D Vision Surround they often revisted this theme before actually cranking the shit up. The first game we are shown is Battlefield Bad Company 2 from EA. First they show us it on the center of three screens in 3D, then they 'crank that shit up' and display it on all three screens. Next was World of Warcraft. The scene they show is of a charater riding a flying dragon through the world. The frame rate looked really terrible, but it could be the fact that WoW is very old.

 

Jesse from EA takes the stage to show us a car from Need for Speed created with interative ray tracing. It is very shiny and looks very real. The Nvidia Design Garage features dozens of these ultra-realistic super cars which you can manipulate. Nvidia then mentioned a little 'game' that they developed called Supersonic Sled which is meant to display Physx, 3D, and tessellation. Basically it is a very controllable and interactive demo featuring a poor fellow on a very fast rocket sled. You can sabotage his sled before the rocket fires (by firing a chicken gun at it), you can place crates full of feathers on the track, you can dictate the quantity of fragments that the bridge can break into and you can even display the Physx vectors. One of the most impressive tweaks was when they increased the bridge particles from 10,000 to 1,000,000 and then they viewed them as the fell from below. The Design Garage and Supersonic Sled will be included free of charge with every GTX 480.

The final piece of eye candy that we received was a 3D Vision Surround demo of Metro 2033 from THQ. They chose to show of the beginning of the game where you venture outside into the ashy wasteland before you and 3 other men find themselves way too close to a stampede of mutated monsters. It is a very exciting scene indeed.

Nvidia then closed out the presentation by awarding GTX 480s to two random attendees (congratulations you guys!) and let us know that we would be able to find GTX 480s in stores in about two weeks. Then they threw some more 'Crank that shit up!' shirts at us. All in all, it was a pretty impressive and appropriate way to christen their new product offering.


10 Comments
Saturday, March 27, 2010 10:08:57 AM
So, How many security guards did the winners have when they got there cards?
Saturday, March 27, 2010 11:35:38 AM
i wasnt expecting the cranck that...up part from a company such nv lol..but hey if it works.
Monday, March 29, 2010 10:43:25 AM
-RK
Senior Member
It's an impressive card, but fastest graphics card in the world? That's quite a claim considering that the 5970 still beats it soundly in most of the benchmarks I've seen at this point.

Also, Steve you need to do some grammar checking in this post!

"He let us know that they decided to launch their new product here at PAX because of the support, passion and honest of the PAX attendees."

"Drew flat out said that the GTX 480 is the fastest graphic card in the world"

I'm being nitpicky because you're usually pretty damn good at this stuff.

;)
Monday, March 29, 2010 1:06:27 PM
btahir
n00b
when would cards like Nvidia gt 340 be released?

I am asking because I have already purchased a HD 5670 and have like 3 week left for a refund. I plan for a refund if I can get a card like Nvidia 3 series (comparable to Ati HD5670) within the 3 weeks.

Thanks, Btw ATI 5970 is the fastest GPU in the world as of now and not the GTX 480.

Cheers!
Monday, March 29, 2010 3:31:54 PM
ultima
Senior Member
its interesting how THEIR graph doesn't match
what other reviews graphs say...

and also considering the 5870 can beat it
in some games as well...
Monday, March 29, 2010 3:53:45 PM
Ah, not impressed they might have a better (base) architecture to work from, but this iteration is not it. GTX480 is holding the crown but the GTX470 is the joker, basically the few review that got it show it less of a card than the 5850 costing more, more power and hot.

The tessellation crunching power of the GTX480 is there, Nvidia just needs to get power and heat worked out. I haven't heard if it was a chip design problem or more with TSMC production problems or a little of both. I think a re-spin might work out some issues (heat/power), while finding all 512 Cuda cores would boost overall performance/power ratio. The real problem is the large chip size that causes less chips per wafer (compared to ATI) and lower yields there really isn't way for Nvidia to make ground. They're 6 months (actually more) behind, and have been using engineering resources to message this; which have probably set back the re-spin team and overall long term architecture improvements. Then consider Nvidia this need to figure how best to scale back this to get decent $100-250 variants, that really looks like it won't be easy.

Tuesday, March 30, 2010 12:31:06 AM
ultima
Senior Member
i doubt the 340 series will be soon

and they are just the 200 series rebadged
and a slight upgrade to the chip.


@casecutter
i read a bit about their problems
ati had the same issues with making the
4770. however that was a small step for them. instead of a major step that nvidia took. hence the delays and voltage leakage causing heat.

ati learned and adjusted and then created
the 5000 series from their leasons
Tuesday, March 30, 2010 11:37:01 AM
@ultima -- Totaly agree ATI put there toe in TSMC 40Nm process and had issues. They thought and where told we've got our sh!# together after that, but the whole dead areas in Stream Processors is a production defect along with probably even worse (totally cripped) chip that can't be used at all. Nividia has simlar TSMC issues in the fact they could even get all of there 512 Cuda Cores, we don't even know what other are gleded like. I don't think they could even use those as look at the 5830 they had to up-clock to make the differance and those are hungry for power, I don't think these GT100 chip can take much more!

Also BSN posted a MWave product page that was upload early, they where dicussing the pricing, but what caught my eye was EVGA, BFG, and other all specifically list ONE YEAR WARRANTIES... http://www.brightsideofnews.com/news/2010/3/26/e-tail-watch-gtx-470-is-243502c-gtx-480-is-245002c-oc-models-available.aspx

XFX may not be sell GTX4XX ?
http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/news/video/xfx-jumps-gtx-480-gtx-470-ship/

"XFX, a division of PINE Technologies, will not be releasing any GeForce GTX 400 series graphics cards"... And look to be building a TOP End 5970
http://www.legitreviews.com/article/1263/1/
Wednesday, March 31, 2010 10:55:41 AM
Steve
The Progenitor
@Casecutter I heard something similar from Nvidia about XFX. I think that is a trumor.
Thursday, April 01, 2010 11:30:55 AM
I think it true XFX couldn't get Nvidia to help underwrite any chip related failures they were finding in the testing when qualifying and weren't comfortable with the idea of not offering there double life warranty and having to take on the cost alone.
Add Comment
Name:

Comments:
This is a moderated comment list. All posts are subject to my personal approval. Please limit your comments to the subject of the article. Don't (for example) start asking questions about your video card here, you'll get a much better response in the forums.

Anonymous posts are allowed, but I encourage you to sign up for the forums and post comments under your name.
none   none