Quick Card Search:
navigation About Us Contact Us Compare Videocards Forum Links Search Cards Submit A Videocard Videocard Table Home Video Card Review Finder Video Card Superlatives Video Card Database Video Card News
Tabs   Tabs

HD 3650, HD 3470 and HD 3450 coverage.

AMD is launching three midrange cards today. They are the HD 3650, HD 3470 and HD 3450. I am currently gathering content about all these cards from the usual suspects for this post, but after I finish that, I will attempt to get these cards added to the database. UPDATE! A freak accident has occured! Mike has added the new chips and cards to the database for me! Now I'll I have to do is add the review and the retail cards. Not being coordinated has never worked so well!

The first coverage I came across is the AMD slides over at [H]ard|OCP. Lately the [H] has been focusing on enthusiast hardware and not mid-range hardware so that is why they are only providing these slides.

Anandtech has a short 4 page introduction article about these new products. They are using two of the slides that were part of the set that [H]ard|OCP posted, and they discuss display port technology and hybrid graphics technology:

"In addition to the hardware specs above, these new parts do introduce some new technologies. Both the 3600 and 3400 lineup support DisplayPort with the first on silicon implementation in the industry. The 3400 series also supports Hybrid Graphics which combines the power of on-board and add-in graphics to increase the potential graphics power for cheap hardware."

The only review I have found so far is from Hot Hardware. They wrote up a 10 page review of a reference HD 3650. I was going to write about how this card compares to the HD 2600 XT, but their paragraph is exactly what I wanted to say:

"The previous generation Radeon HD 2600 XT is available for about $110 to $170 on-line depending on its memory configuration. Despite having a lower price (MSRP $99) and consuming less power (10 Watts less at load), the new Radeon HD 3650 was able to outpace the 2600 XT in a couple of benchmarks (HL2: EP2 and Crysis), and where the 2600 XT pulled ahead it wasn’t by a significant margin."

 

HD 3650 pic.

12 Comments
Wednesday, January 23, 2008 1:26:44 PM
enthusiast
guest
TODAY?
HAVE I BEEN LIVING UNDER A STONE?
I just wish the 3650 also supported Hybrid Graphics -_-.Nice to have the Ruby chick right on your'e cooler tho, makes the card look prettier.
When is the 3670/ 3690 coming out?
Thursday, January 24, 2008 2:27:38 AM
wyz135
Senior Member
DAMN!!! I SHOULD HAVE WAITED AND GET THE RADEON 3650 INSTEAD OF THE RADEON HD2600XT!!! T.T
Thursday, January 24, 2008 7:46:23 AM
wyz135
Senior Member
Man, after looking at the reviews, looks like the HD2600XT is better. Anyway this card is to replace HD2600PRO, when will the HD3670/3690 coming out to replace the HD2600XT?!? I'm planning to sell my HD2600XT and grab one of this
Friday, January 25, 2008 5:55:24 AM
Radiator
Senior Member
Bad idea , mate . I wouldn't buy either... unless the HD 3670/90 is based on a newer and better chip .
Friday, January 25, 2008 7:13:15 PM
BringItON
guest
the 3690 is pretty much a 128bit HD3850.nvidia is putting out something quite the opposite namely the 9600gt, which has a core only half as powerful as a 8800gts but the same amount of memory bandwith.
And yes RV635 is all same as Rv630, consumes a bit less power(~5W at same clocks in load), have slightly higher stock volts/clocks and contain some extras like DX10.1, 4.1 etc which are useless to the end user.So if you bought the 2600xt be happy.
Friday, January 25, 2008 11:08:26 PM
well u dont buy these to play games anyway, rather for hd video and such.
Saturday, January 26, 2008 6:55:04 AM
"ATi"diot
guest
@wyz135 since you have bought your Radeon HD2600XT, continue using it, don't waste your money on this... The Radeon HD2600XT is quite powerful...
Saturday, January 26, 2008 6:58:28 AM
"ATi"diot
guest
BTW, nice to have the Ruby chick on the card, I hate nvidia's fairy used in their designs. The Ruby is very cool at the videos.... man I just :love" her...lol
Sunday, January 27, 2008 2:06:45 PM
Radiator
Senior Member
The HD 2600 XT isn't very powerful... a X1950 Pro or a HD 3850 would be better .
But yeah... a HD 3650 is basically a HD 2600 XT .
As for the HD 3690 , why 128bit ? Dumb move .. but whatever .
Sunday, January 27, 2008 3:12:34 PM
Mzdhr
guest
WTF ATI!!!
when ati will be showing the Highend VGA???
Sunday, January 27, 2008 5:07:11 PM
Adam
guest
Dusk was one badass fairy which runs about 96FPS on my 8800 Ultra, but again Ruby is sexy as well. (I create CG art). Does this card use a 55nm core?
Monday, January 28, 2008 12:20:55 PM
anonymous
guest
128 bit candy bars pretending to be something more. ATi, this is why your value cards fall short for the money.
Add Comment
Name:

Comments:
This is a moderated comment list. All posts are subject to my personal approval. Please limit your comments to the subject of the article. Don't (for example) start asking questions about your video card here, you'll get a much better response in the forums.

Anonymous posts are allowed, but I encourage you to sign up for the forums and post comments under your name.
none   none