We'll be running the GTS 250 through a few benchmarks just to verify that it equals the 9800 GTX+ performance-wise.
Our review "software suite" consists of:
|
- 182.06 WHQL drivers from Palit
-
Windows Vista Ultimate 64 bit
-
3DMark Vantage
-
F.E.A.R. 2
-
Far Cry 2
|
Our
review hardware consists of (my PC):
|
-
CPU: Intel Core 2 Quad QX6700 @2,666MHz
-
Motherboard: MSI P7N
SLI Platinum
-
Video Cards: Evga 9800 GTX+ (512-P3-N844-AR) and Palit
GTS 250
-
Memory: 4GB (2x 2GB) Corsair Dominator PC2-8500
@800MHz
-
Hard Drive: Western Digital 250GB SATA 7,200RPM
-
PSU: Enermax Galaxy DXX 1,000 Watt
-
PC Monitor: Samsung 20" 204B LCD
-
HDTV: Sharp LC-37GP1U 37" 1080p LCD
|
Our
testing methodology involves me playing a game and recording 2 minute sections
using Fraps. I get at least 3 two minute runs and then I average the
Minimum, Maximum and Average FPS numbers. The settings are kept the same for
both graphics cards. No filtering or antialiasing were used while running the 3DMark
benchmarks.
n00b
You should keep doing reviews... this would get more people to use forums and the webpage :)
I personally love this site.
n00b
Hope to be really scary w/ those glasses.
ps: sweet review
Member
P.S. I have checked other review and I see the only real difference in the 9800 GTX and the GTS 250 is the GTS 250 is shorter, and uses slightly less power.