Choose A Different Card:
nVidia GeForce GTX 670
|
At A Glance
Details
|
Reference Images
![]() |
Related Cards
|
| Price | Name | Core | Mem | Buswidth | Memory | Displays | TV | VIVO | HD | HDCP | 2-Slot | |
| $412.99 | Galaxy GeForce GTX 670 GC | 1006 | 3004 | 256 bit | 2048 MB | HDMI / DP | y | - | y | d | y | |
![]() |
$419.99 | Zotac GeForce GTX 670 AMP! | 1098 | 3304 | 256 bit | 2048 MB | HDMI / DP | y | - | y | d | y |
![]() |
$389.99 | Zotac GeForce GTX 670 | 915 | 3004 | 256 bit | 2048 MB | HDMI / DP | y | - | y | d | y |
![]() |
Gainward GTX 670 Phantom (2.5 slot) | 1006 | 3054 | 256 bit | 2048 MB | HDMI / DP | y | - | y | d | y | |
![]() |
Gainward GeForce GTX 670 | 915 | 3004 | 256 bit | 2048 MB | HDMI / DP | y | - | y | d | y | |
![]() |
PNY GeForce GTX 670 | 915 | 3004 | 256 bit | 2048 MB | HDMI / DP | y | - | y | d | y | |
![]() |
inno3D GeForce GTX 670 | 915 | 3004 | 256 bit | 2048 MB | HDMI / DP | y | - | y | d | y | |
![]() |
POV GeForce GTX 670 | 915 | 3004 | 256 bit | 2048 MB | HDMI / DP | y | - | y | d | y | |
![]() |
Palit GeForce GTX 670 JetStream | 1006 | 3054 | 256 bit | 2048 MB | HDMI / DP | y | - | y | d | y | |
![]() |
EVGA GeForce GTX 670 Superclocked | 967 | 3104 | 256 bit | 2048 MB | HDMI / DP | y | - | y | d | y | |
| Galaxy GeForce GTX 670 | 915 | 3004 | 256 bit | 2048 MB | HDMI / DP | y | - | y | d | y | ||
![]() |
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 670 OC | 980 | 3004 | 256 bit | 2048 MB | HDMI / DP | y | - | y | d | y | |
![]() |
EVGA GeForce GTX 670 | 915 | 3004 | 256 bit | 2048 MB | HDMI / DP | y | - | y | d | y | |
![]() |
EVGA GeForce GTX 670 FTW | 1006 | 3104 | 256 bit | 2048 MB | HDMI / DP | y | - | y | d | y | |
![]() |
EVGA GeForce GTX 670 4GB | 915 | 3004 | 256 bit | 4096 MB | HDMI / DP | y | - | y | d | y | |
![]() |
EVGA GeForce GTX 670 4GB Superclocked | 967 | 3104 | 256 bit | 4096 MB | HDMI / DP | y | - | y | d | y | |
![]() |
ASUS GeForce GTX 670 DirectCU II | 915 | 3004 | 256 bit | 2048 MB | HDMI / DP | y | - | y | d | y | |
![]() |
ASUS GeForce GTX 670 DirectCU II OC | 1058 | 3004 | 256 bit | 2048 MB | HDMI / DP | y | - | y | d | y | |
![]() |
Club3D GeForce GTX 670 | 915 | 3004 | 256 bit | 2048 MB | HDMI / DP | y | - | y | d | y | |
![]() |
KFA2 GeForce GTX 670 EX OC | 1006 | 3004 | 256 bit | 2048 MB | HDMI / DP | y | - | y | d | y | |
![]() |
KFA2 GeForce GTX 670 | 915 | 3004 | 256 bit | 2048 MB | HDMI / DP | y | - | y | d | y |
3 Comments
Add Comment
This is a moderated comment list. All posts are subject to my personal approval. Please limit your comments to this card. Don't (for example) startasking questions about your video card here, you'll get a much better response in the forums. Anonymous posts are allowed, but I encourage you to sign up for the forums and post comments under your name. |











The Progenitor
n00b
n00b
In programs that use more memory (Metro 2033, multi-screen setups, etc...) the 7970 beats the 680. The 7970 and GTX 670 are damn equal in a lot of things. The 680 (and 670) is by far better for gaming in general.
I've been an owner of both Nvidia and AMD cards in my time. I have no bias towards either company.
Plus, if you look at the sheer compute strength of the 7970, a single one has beaten SLI'd GTX 680's. I'm a person who is more compute oriented (3Ds Max, Sketchup, things like that) so AMD is arguably the better route. I might edit in that the GTX 580 beats the GTX 680 in compute oriented tasks. It is just strange too because Nvidia HIGHLY advertises their compute strengths. More so than AMD, in fact.
It is just that people have taken better to Nvidia because they made it easy to program. AMD with their new GCN architecture aims to be easier to program for/with, so undoubtedly as soon as AMD catches on in some eyes, good things will happen. People will program their works to perform better to AMD-related components. That being said, once it all happens, there will be very little discerning performance between the 7970/680, and future generations.
Not trying to start a flame war. It is just my personal opinion. This was also my ramble-fest. :)