7800GT Benchmarks

[jmf1775]

Can anyone tell me how to achieve:

Pixel Fill Rate: 6400 MPixels/sec
Texture Fill Rate: 8000 MTexels/sec the Pixel Fill Rate

These are the benchmarks shown on this site for 7800GT. I have an XFX 7800Gt and am showing 5500 for both rates using Everest Home.

Thanks for any tips.

[Mike]

The numbers listed on this site are theoretical maximums. The amount you actually get in any particular game or application can vary widely depending on other factors. If you're concerned that your 7800GT isn't performing at the level it should, I would run a more common benchmark like 3DMark05 and compare that to the numbers on this site.

[jmf1775]

Thanks Mike, I ran the free version of 3DMark05 and got these scores:

3DMark Score 7193 3DMarks
CPU Score 6004 CPUMarks

Game Tests
GT1 - Return To Proxycon 31.6 fps
GT2 - Firefly Forest 21.6 fps
GT3 - Canyon Flight 34.9 fps

CPU Tests
CPU Test 1 3.4 fps
CPU Test 2 4.8 fps


This is my system setup:

Operating System Microsoft Windows XP
DirectX Version 9.0c
Mobo Manufacturer MICRO-STAR INTERNATIONAL CO., LTD
Mobo Model MS-7125
AGP Rates (Current/Available) N/A / N/A
CPU AMD Athlon(tm) 64 2411 MHz
FSB 201 MHz
Memory 2048 MB

Display Information
Graphics Chipset NVIDIA GeForce 7800 GT
Driver Name NVIDIA GeForce 7800 GT
Driver Version 8.1.9.4
Driver Status Non WHQL - Not FM Approved
Video Memory 256 MB
Core Clock 450 MHz
Memory Clock 1053 MHz

I'd appreciate you're opinion and any suggestions you have on how to improve performance.

[Mike]

you're doing great, that's a very good 3dmark score for your setup...you have absolutely nothing to worry about...just keep your drivers up to date and you should be in good shape...

[jmf1775]

Mike,

I forgot to mention I have a and Athlon 64 3800 on a MSI K8N Neo4 MB so I installed they're CoreCenter utility and overclocked the CPU by 7% through Windows. The overall score stayed the same but I did see an increase in the CPU scores, here's the new numbers:

5432
2.6
5.1

Also, my fill rates are reading consistently at 9000 now everytime I look, think that one reading was some sort of fluke. This is on a XFX Card OC by XFX. I just ran the same tests in another system using an eVGA 7800GT that was OC by eVGA and the results came in slightly less than XFX which makes sense as they're is a slight differnece (5-10mhz) in how much higher the XFX card is Oc'd.

Thanks for creating such a great sight...the comparison page is awesome!

John