brightblack
11-18-2005, 01:32 AM
We were discussing here at work today how much effect the naming of cards has on purchasing. Don't get me wrong, I don't mean 'I don't like the name 9600, so I wont buy one', or '9500 is higher than 7800 therefore I'll buy that', I mean the name additions and within company namings schemes.
Personally, I get confused between XLs XTs, Pro's, GT, GTX, GTO and all the other suffixes. I also spend a fair amount of time on spec pages trying to compare cards which sounded similar, 9500 vs. 9550 vs. 9600 plus Pro/ whatever suffixes.(Actually, that's how I ended up on this site.)
The questions then are: Do the companies do these kind of names to mislead intentionally, or is it purely to give them scope to do different core/memory configs? Also, do the profusion of names confuse, and has anyone bought a card, thinking it was a better card with different specs? (e.g. 9800 SE vs. 9800 XT)
Personally, I get confused between XLs XTs, Pro's, GT, GTX, GTO and all the other suffixes. I also spend a fair amount of time on spec pages trying to compare cards which sounded similar, 9500 vs. 9550 vs. 9600 plus Pro/ whatever suffixes.(Actually, that's how I ended up on this site.)
The questions then are: Do the companies do these kind of names to mislead intentionally, or is it purely to give them scope to do different core/memory configs? Also, do the profusion of names confuse, and has anyone bought a card, thinking it was a better card with different specs? (e.g. 9800 SE vs. 9800 XT)