rocknerd
09-28-2006, 07:42 AM
hello all.
let me start off by saying WONDERFUL website.
FINALLY an unabridged database for GPU info!!!
and now on to the task at hand.
i built a very outdated system last year, please dont ask why. i need my brain examined.
as follows-
P4 3.06HT
1.5G of RD ram
and i was using a geforce 6600GT 128MB until now. (AGP)
this week ive been trying a few different cards.
my first was an ATI x1300 pro 512MB it was not better than my 6600. ($170)
then i picked up an ATI X1600XT 256MB AGP ($230)
it is definitely better. but ive been reading reveiws about the comparison between the x1600xt and the geforce 7600gs and that its really not worth spending an extra 100 for the ATI card when the 7600gs hangs pretty close with the ATI.
the ATI has GREAT clock speeds for the memory (1.3Ghtz)
and the core is 650.
but the 7600 is only 400 core and 400 memory (800 effective)
but im noticing that all nvidias crush in pipelines and texture operations.
so my question is should i sacrafice good clock speeds for better pipelines and texture filling? and save $100?
most benchmark reviews had the 7600 staying within 10FPS with the x1600XT and even beat it out in some games like FEAR...
i would really like to find a geforce 7600GT (not GS) but its gard to find for AGP.
very sorry for the long ramble.
any info would be much obliged!!!
thanks- rocknerd.
**edit**
PS- the GPU was really the weakest link in my PC and selecting the right video card would really help me out.
let me start off by saying WONDERFUL website.
FINALLY an unabridged database for GPU info!!!
and now on to the task at hand.
i built a very outdated system last year, please dont ask why. i need my brain examined.
as follows-
P4 3.06HT
1.5G of RD ram
and i was using a geforce 6600GT 128MB until now. (AGP)
this week ive been trying a few different cards.
my first was an ATI x1300 pro 512MB it was not better than my 6600. ($170)
then i picked up an ATI X1600XT 256MB AGP ($230)
it is definitely better. but ive been reading reveiws about the comparison between the x1600xt and the geforce 7600gs and that its really not worth spending an extra 100 for the ATI card when the 7600gs hangs pretty close with the ATI.
the ATI has GREAT clock speeds for the memory (1.3Ghtz)
and the core is 650.
but the 7600 is only 400 core and 400 memory (800 effective)
but im noticing that all nvidias crush in pipelines and texture operations.
so my question is should i sacrafice good clock speeds for better pipelines and texture filling? and save $100?
most benchmark reviews had the 7600 staying within 10FPS with the x1600XT and even beat it out in some games like FEAR...
i would really like to find a geforce 7600GT (not GS) but its gard to find for AGP.
very sorry for the long ramble.
any info would be much obliged!!!
thanks- rocknerd.
**edit**
PS- the GPU was really the weakest link in my PC and selecting the right video card would really help me out.